You may recall that according to Republicans, extending the Bush tax cuts for millionaires was an absolute necessity. In fact, failing to extend that tax cut for the rich would have amounted to a tax increase and was thus verboten. At least, that was the ruling of Grover Norquist, the unelected Washington lobbyist to whom most Republicans have outsourced such determinations. So, that leads to a question: Why is failing to extend a temporary tax cut to millionaires considered a tax increase, while failing to extend a temporary tax cut for working people is somehow NOT a tax increase? Why is one unacceptable, and the other unacceptable? What a silly silly question. Because Grover Norquist told them so, that’s why. As Norquist told reporters after a closed-door session with House Republicans Thursday, “For the president to run around and say not continuing a temporary tax cut is an increase is inaccurate.”
-
koalastick reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
viciousneutral likes this
-
urbandreamscapes likes this
-
workingoninteresting likes this
-
soiledphotos likes this
-
littleblackkittycat likes this
-
butchrosser likes this
-
brevetcaptain likes this
-
justanotherwastedyouth reblogged this from onehundreddollars
-
onehundreddollars reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
onehundreddollars likes this
-
politicsplus reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
politicsplus likes this
-
thetpr likes this
-
thepowerofstories likes this
-
politicore likes this
-
handgrenade2 likes this
-
reagan-was-a-horrible-president reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
elusivemusings likes this
-
santhonythomas likes this
-
truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from likethedew
-
turnmyheadintosound likes this
-
bohemiansouth reblogged this from likethedew
-
likethedew posted this